From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 01:13:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5340A106566C; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737A58FC18; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so582757ggn.13 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:13:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YC4wQfVpp13e8R1tYxYra6ycfVnfX1Yt9gNmTMN8Blk=; b=Wr6MZccKxr8ATL99vJbonGxfyZLCnbyaHov9egkVQ6xJEvhXgTU1RcoyDSS4oXnCRE yIkf6Lcj0lD1nKtGJRYlBXqCSBDZdaydTe4mS8WULx9A62e7c8woebG+tdPmpmxCbqE4 fJcMOE4w70t3/dZW2oQaPVGcGtrka9ckViE8UqWcrKTO2C+Wf2K59n1QKtEEAbEc/nNG Lqe1Pe34ly0RLTUq7OLr6NLgQRFgAkow4RKqupFFycgTirgIKeozRi42sMTHEVHINDTz rfVdOJvkutNqzsVIdJSB+yp+H51a+avzWKwmKj6bPBkmLCAW/um/kF4kQz/lxnrURgkp J/rA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.85.201 with SMTP id j9mr1173641igz.16.1337908395704; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.244.8 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.244.8 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:13:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:13:15 +0800 Message-ID: From: Marcelo Araujo To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , miwi@freebsd.org, araujo@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: araujo@FreeBSD.org List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 01:13:18 -0000 No, is not necessary ask portmgr or secteam to approve if it is a security update. On May 24, 2012 1:21 AM, "Eitan Adler" wrote: > On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval. > > However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I > believe > > isn't necessary the maintainer approval. > > portmgr or secteam still needs to approve. > > > -- > Eitan Adler > Source & Ports committer > X11, Bugbusting teams >