From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 16:32:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22420106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdp-freebsd-pf@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4978FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1Tz-0006EJ-AE for freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:32:39 +0200 Received: from 208.85.208.53 ([208.85.208.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:32:39 +0200 Received: from atkin901 by 208.85.208.53 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:32:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org From: Mark Atkinson Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:32:25 -0700 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <20120905115140.GF15915@FreeBSD.org> <50476187.8000303@gibfest.dk> <20120905183607.GI15915@glebius.int.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.85.208.53 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120904 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <20120905183607.GI15915@glebius.int.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:32:39 -0000 On 09/05/2012 11:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > What's bad with "getting stuck" with old syntax? I personally don't > have any problems with it. I have had problems with performance, > however. Just as an aside is there a decent set of stable web docs for FreeBSD's current syntax? I'm constantly burned when I try to looks something up (because it isn't working like I expect) and all I find is the new, sexy syntax with all it's quick 'match' operators and their ilk.