From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  1 13:08:24 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9C6298;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2013 13:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net
 [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE9E3F2;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2013 13:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (spaceball.home.andric.com [192.168.0.6])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC2B5C5A;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2013 14:08:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <510BBE48.4070101@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:08:24 +0100
From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:19.0) Gecko/20130117 Thunderbird/19.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99
References: <5106953E.2020907@FreeBSD.org> <510BBCAD.3070705@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <510BBCAD.3070705@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:08:24 -0000

On 2013-02-01 14:01, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 28/01/2013 17:11 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> I wonder why the following is the case for the base gcc.
>> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++config.h:
>>
>> /* Define if C99 functions or macros from <wchar.h>, <math.h>, <complex.h>,
>>     <stdio.h>, and <stdlib.h> can be used or exposed. */
>> /* #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 */
>>
>> Because of this undef there is no e.g. std::strtoll().
>> Ditto for other things in stdlib.h.

Maybe this support can't be enabled, because we don't expose all the
required functions yet?  Or maybe it is just something that was
committed years ago, and then forgotten.

If we are sure that all the C99 functions libstdc++ requires are now
available and working, I see no problem in turning on _GLIBCXX_USE_C99.