From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:43:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ABB1065670 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBBD8FC0C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:43:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: p02MOU6m019371 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr (217-162-216-74.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.216.74]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id p02MOU6m019371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 00:24:38 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Glen Barber References: <4D1352ED.3070300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:24:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4D1352ED.3070300@FreeBSD.org> (Glen Barber's message of "Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:47:25 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for Comments: Removal of 6.x from FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:43:18 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:47:25 -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > I have a patch attached which is a starting point for removal of 6.x > from the FAQ page[1]. There are many places in the FAQ where 6.x is > mentioned, some of which will be more in-depth edits and will require > some significant changes, so I plan to do this in chunks which will > help make things easier for the translation teams as a result. > [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/introduction.html I'm quite supportive of the idea to remove 6.X bits from the FAQ, especially if we plan ahead a bit and do it in stages before the next stable release. I'd be interested to see, for example, something like: January 25 - remove 6.X references from FAQ front page January 25 - February 15 - remove bits about 6.X specific code, file formats, binaries, etc. February 16 - March 1 - verify we didn't remove useful bits The dates are entirely guesswork at this point, and they shouldn't be considered even remotely close to a 'schedule', but we can aim for something like this set of dates IMO. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0g+wMACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7bUzwCgqe0B/LgX7HllMz44hEyT6k76 lwQAn0eG+bf0W1PIETUK0qe1UYTFdxmi =x11L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--