Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:24:03 +0100 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for Comments: Removal of 6.x from FAQ Message-ID: <xeiar5cvdjwc.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <4D1352ED.3070300@FreeBSD.org> (Glen Barber's message of "Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:47:25 -0500") References: <4D1352ED.3070300@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:47:25 -0500, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > I have a patch attached which is a starting point for removal of 6.x > from the FAQ page[1]. There are many places in the FAQ where 6.x is > mentioned, some of which will be more in-depth edits and will require > some significant changes, so I plan to do this in chunks which will > help make things easier for the translation teams as a result. > [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/introduction.html I'm quite supportive of the idea to remove 6.X bits from the FAQ, especially if we plan ahead a bit and do it in stages before the next stable release. I'd be interested to see, for example, something like: January 25 - remove 6.X references from FAQ front page January 25 - February 15 - remove bits about 6.X specific code, file formats, binaries, etc. February 16 - March 1 - verify we didn't remove useful bits The dates are entirely guesswork at this point, and they shouldn't be considered even remotely close to a 'schedule', but we can aim for something like this set of dates IMO. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0g+wMACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7bUzwCgqe0B/LgX7HllMz44hEyT6k76 lwQAn0eG+bf0W1PIETUK0qe1UYTFdxmi =x11L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xeiar5cvdjwc.fsf>