From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 3 6: 5:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A71237B417 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 06:05:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA48199; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:24:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:05:47 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Hovey To: Rod Person Cc: Ken McGlothlen , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: This is *not* a racist comment In-Reply-To: <20020102214229.3ddef676.roddierod@yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I think I'm missing something(I did erase the original post already)? But > why would blocking how can blocking e-mail from a domain be an issue for a > lawyer? Don't people have the right to block things from entering their > servers? Actually because ISPs are locally owned private networks (even though they are globally connected) and there are a variety of option for the end user (I mean other ISPs they can change to) there is no real issue on the legal end related to blocking inbound email. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message