From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 10:50:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C0E16A57E for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3943D46 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:50:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0GInvU7038075; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:49:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0GInxXw028248; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:49:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040116134753.03e16c08@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:48:58 -0500 To: From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.1.1.0.20040116122719.05c75910@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HiFn / FAST_IPSEC question X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:50:04 -0000 I am more curious about what happens if you try 194 sessions on one or 65 on the other, not why one is rated lower than the other. ---Mike At 01:40 PM 16/01/2004, Miguel Hernandez y Lopez wrote: >maybe is because the card only hace 32KB dram, and the second have 128KB >just wondering... :) >kind regards > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Miguel Jose Hernandez y Lopez Tel +52 834 3188150 >Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas mhdz@tamaulipas.gob.mx >Telecomunicaciones @ Depto. de Seguridad http://www.tamaulipas.gob.mx > > >-----Mensaje original----- >De: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org]En nombre de Mike Tancsa >Enviado el: Viernes, 16 de Enero de 2004 12:10 p.m. >Para: security@freebsd.org >Asunto: HiFn / FAST_IPSEC question > > >Hi, > Just got some of the new Soekris 1401 VPN cards based on the hifn > 7955 >chip. > >hifn0 mem 0xe8510000-0xe8517fff,0xe8518000-0xe8519fff,0xe851a000-0xe851afff >irq 5 at device 0.0 on pci1 >hifn0: Hifn 7955, rev 0, 32KB dram, 64 sessions > >vs > >hifn0 mem 0xeb902000-0xeb902fff,0xeb901000-0xeb901fff irq 10 at device 8.0 >on pci0 >hifn0: Hifn 7951, rev 0, 128KB sram, 193 sessions > > >When it says "n sessions" how does that specifically impact IPSEC ? Does it >really mean I can only have 64 SAs ? > > ---Mike >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 >Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net >Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net >Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"