From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 6 21:31:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA15302 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:31:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA15207 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:31:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA03816; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:29:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802070529.VAA03816@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Peter Philipp cc: Nick Folino , "'FreeBSD-Stable'" Subject: Re: cvsupd install problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Feb 1998 00:21:53 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 21:29:57 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe stable" > I have found it to be a nuisance when I don't want to use X for cvsup and > it needs those modula libraries. Anythign that depends on such a library > should be X interfaced only. IMO. Have you ever considered, any of you, that CVSup is available in package form? And that the "CVSUP-nogui" package just might not actually require these libraries? Or do you just assume that the author and everyone else that's ever looked at the source are snobbish bastards with overspecified systems? 8) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com