From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 14 16:03:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165DFC0B for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ea0-x234.google.com (mail-ea0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDAA185B for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id o10so5805771eaj.25 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:03:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6im4/WObkQS7p6eV2Z+UMemDBt4CD7b/vJ3U+DPNR9U=; b=qdolgYEOrrCOvNmF7idMRntQIk2syUhg66rncY9/rWTA28sc+V6AUeHMwcScxSPXTR eMvSBM/0LMnC1vlrT+6EqR8ztfQsa2LO9wMhKs8ockJeefGaxoZ5I4SgHNAElwRNdgiJ 2hEcqw+Hqts4eHz+32BxbXURX9dvIMyjBE8gI9hxGsldeve/RwB2D8NDpnwKgYrFrF7f zVti0+9fUQCfwgkPaZLdVF+r5utA1CWja5IYYFgXuxPbGGBp+GtZjbahIqaWTCFvfywC 1oGFWcWlBGKyZGU3adY6y3bs8zsBXSpOQlAjVdM5RM2qOQruqzDyYH78+kz9FgpvWi28 XMYg== X-Received: by 10.14.224.68 with SMTP id w44mr354389eep.107.1392393783001; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.77.101] (mail1.amcu.gov.ua. [213.160.139.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm21258381eeo.8.2014.02.14.08.03.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:03:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FE3E2D.9030702@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:02:53 +0200 From: Kozlov Sergey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen R Guglielmo , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster vs pkg tools References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:03:05 -0000 Hello If you're not using the 10th branch - do you have "WITH_PKGNG=yes" set in your /etc/make.conf? Check out the http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/pkgng-intro.html Regards, Kozlov Sergey On 14.02.2014 17:57, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote: > Hey list, > > Back on the previous pkg_* system, I used portmaster to check my port > integrity and dependencies: > > portmaster -y -v --clean-distfiles > portmaster -y -v --check-depends > portmaster -y -v --check-port-dbdir > > However, I noticed the new `pkg` command has its own `check` and `clean` > commands. > > When I run both on the new pkgng format, it seemed to corrupt a database. > Portmaster said things were installed when they weren't, and pkg threw some > errors about packages. I don't have the exact errors anymore because i > fixed it, but I'm wondering which set of commands would be best to use? I'd > assume the pkg tools themselves, as portmaster is an external program. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"