From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 19:18:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14816A401 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B104E43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:18:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2QJIXEK001260; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <4426E90E.20002@highperformance.net> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:18:38 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <4425EB38.5070604@highperformance.net> <86odztyqpr.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86odztyqpr.fsf@xps.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: First to Dual License Wins? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:18:40 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. It worked for SSH (OpenSSH > was derived from the last free release of SSH before Tatu Ylonen went > into business). The reason why it didn't work for Sleepycat DB is > probably that there were already plenty of alternatives, such as dbm, > gdbm, ndbm, cdb, tdb etc. > >> So the first party to dual license some software and add a bit of value >> to the code in the process basically wins. > > Only if the original developer can't keep up, or they are the original > developer, and there is no competition. I hadn't considered how competition works into the discussion. In your example there is basically a pre-existing "fork" ready for people to move to if their first choice ends up encumbered. And thanks for the list of prospective databases. I'll be looking into those. Later, Jason C. Wells