From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 4 15:30:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2C1106566B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA16D8FC13 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p44FU9sr012892 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p44FU9C1012890; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:09 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201105041530.p44FU9C1012890@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, "David O'Brien" Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F001065676 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBF28FC22 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p44FR67E056052 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 08:27:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p44FR6WD056051; Wed, 4 May 2011 08:27:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Message-Id: <201105041527.p44FR6WD056051@dragon.nuxi.org> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 08:27:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "David O'Brien" To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: Subject: bin/156817: WITHOUT_CDDL and NO_CTF ignored if WITH_CTF defined X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David O'Brien List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:30:10 -0000 >Number: 156817 >Category: bin >Synopsis: WITHOUT_CDDL and NO_CTF ignored if WITH_CTF defined >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed May 04 15:30:09 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: David O'Brien >Release: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT i386 >Organization: The FreeBSD Project >Environment: System: FreeBSD dragon.NUXI.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #664 r221012M: Mon Apr 25 08:32:28 PDT 2011 root@dragon.NUXI.org:/sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386 >Description: Starting with r206082 (I believe), the "-DNO_CTF" became ignored in the "stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims", "stage 1.2: bootstrap tools", "stage 2.3: build tools", and "stage 3: cross tools" parts of the build if WITH_CTF=yes is in '/etc/src.conf'. John Birrell's claim in r179233 is that these stages of the build do not require CTF conversion. Additionally, it appears that WITH_CTF now has higher precidence than WITHOUT_CDDL. [WITH_CTF=yes in /etc/src.conf combined with 'make -DWITHOUT_CDDL buildworld' or WITHOUT_CDDL=yes in /etc/make.conf] If so, I feel this is wrong as if someone has set WITHOUT_CDDL they have strong licensing needs (restrictions). And so not running the CTF tools is of lesser importance than accidently falling into a legal problem. >How-To-Repeat: Perform builds with the above settings and look at the output >Fix: revisit r206082. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: