From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 31 14:48:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFE9B7BD60 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E78C7D51A for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4VEm8mF060865 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 14:48:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219655] TCP Connection Limit Error - sonewconn: Listen queue overflow Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:48:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:48:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219655 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bz@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #12 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- Making these variables per-VNET is not necessarily a good idea; it means a VNET-jail consumer could possibly DoS the system without the administrator having a chance to prevent this easily by exceeding resources. Need to be very careful. I'd hope if this should go into HEAD that there'l= l be a way to "cap" the values or reject excessive requests by some metric at le= ast. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=