From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Apr 26 14:16:09 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA26439
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 14:16:09 -0700
Received: from pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (root@pluto.ops.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.212.23])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA26433
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 14:16:07 -0700
Received: from metal.ops.neosoft.com (root@glenn-slip47.nmt.edu [129.138.5.147]) by pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id QAA04110 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 16:16:01 -0500
Received: (from smace@localhost) by metal.ops.neosoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.10) id PAA02299 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 15:15:57 -0600
From: Scott Mace <smace@metal-mail.neosoft.com>
Message-Id: <199504262115.PAA02299@metal.ops.neosoft.com>
Subject: tcl/tk/tclX/dp/incr-tcl/etc
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 15:15:57 -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 174       
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

What do yall think about integrating all of them into 2 binaries:
tcl and wishx.  This is what I (NeoSoft) uses, and is a much more 
complete environment.

comments?

	Scott