Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:39:35 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: FF <fusionfoto@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Adjusting zvol_immediate_write_sz Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1511131837400.26829@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAD=tpee1_dY79SRpSpx4WUjTukHXSstn%2BqBkkHOJq0-18WhZOg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD=tpecoOsNKkXt5Hp6rQpXcdwKdeM3bpyUyh=C7enbJHH=wZA@mail.gmail.com> <5629E4F5.3030500@multiplay.co.uk> <CAD=tpeeD9Ef-8bby2zZXa%2B0srN951DLh9FgMynJvu6Zi7CHSFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD=tpefgJgFHxuReXWOmTZLzziou6qDti6_uA=rz6k=_VTz%2BsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD=tpee1_dY79SRpSpx4WUjTukHXSstn%2BqBkkHOJq0-18WhZOg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, FF wrote: > This is what I wrote up. It compiles into 9.2 and executes fine. I looked > at the section on 9.3 and it doesn't appear that any changes would be > required. Thanks in advance, to whomever looks at it. Changes to FreeBSD first go into the development trunk and are only merged back to the stable release branches after they have had some time to settle. 9.3 is already released and releng/9.3 will only be modified for security advisories and errata notices, for which this does not seem to qualify. So, it would be better to check the sources in HEAD than 9.3. -Ben Kaduk P.S. 9.2 hit EoL at the end of 2014.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1511131837400.26829>