Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, dwcjr@inethouston.net, cvs@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Message-ID: <XFMail.010512154807.jdp@polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200105110520.IAA31408@ipcard.iptcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Please do the following repo-copies: > ports/net/samba --> ports/net/samba20 > ports/net/samba-devel --> ports/net/samba22 This naming scheme doesn't seem like it's going to scale very well. Why does the version number have to be contained in the name of the directory? Doing it that way will require a repo copy every time a new version comes out. If 2.2 is the production version, then why not upgrade "ports/net/samba" to that version? John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010512154807.jdp>