From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 15 12:52:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail0.atl.bellsouth.net (mail0.atl.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864EA37BE8D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:51:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from corigan@mindspring.com) Received: from daskip (ifitl-214-101-185.atl.bellsouth.net [209.214.101.185] (may be forged)) by mail0.atl.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with SMTP id PAA22761 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:48:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Corigan" To: "FreeBSD Questions List" Subject: RE: Upgrading 3.x -> 4.0 STABLE unneccessarily hard Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:52:52 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am having the same with the same file bombing out the make world. I am trying to figure out what to do about this right now as we speak. Corigan -----Original Message----- > Upgrading 3.x->4.0 STABLE was made harder than it had to be because one > program that is statically linked (objcopy or objdump or something like > that) was trying to statically link to the system libc.a instead of the > temporary libc.a. The system libc.a may not have 'asprintf' in it, bombing > the make. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message