From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 16:59:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7658316A4CE; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:59:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AD743D49; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from [192.168.4.250] (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3FGd2SD004296; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:39:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) In-Reply-To: <20050415162821.GA691@laptop.santcroos.net> References: <20050414103154.GA11341@laptop.santcroos.net> <20050414135004.GB75334@unixpages.org> <20050414172147.GA772@laptop.santcroos.net> <20050415162821.GA691@laptop.santcroos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5e7c3d2084ff2460d6e48786defc8f33@xcllnt.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:39:01 -0700 To: Mark Santcroos X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test: ACPI-CA import 20050408 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:59:49 -0000 On Apr 15, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:20:52AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> In file included from aslcompilerlex.l:122: >> /q/6.x/src/usr.sbin/acpi/iasl/../../../sys/contrib/dev/acpica/ >> compiler/ >> aslcompiler.h:148:23: asldefine.h: No such file or directory > > I fixed this yesterday, you probably fetched it before I uploaded the > new version. Ah, ok. I'll refetch if needed. >> BTW: Is ACPICA getting slower? > > Might be. I don't have numbers on that. I guess we're still focusing on > functionality and not so much on speed. > Do you have a concrete area where you think we are loosing performance? No, not yet. It's just that there are 2 "dead" spots in the booting process of the plutos we have in the cluster and these "dead" spots appeared to be longer. I think there's a lot of AML interpretation going on during that time, but I might be wrong. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net