Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:08:57 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> Cc: jail@FreeBSD.org, fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Marking some FS as jailable Message-ID: <20130214150857.GK44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <511CFBAC.3000803@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130212194047.GE12760@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org> <20130214132715.GG44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <511CF77A.2080005@FreeBSD.org> <20130214145600.GI44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <511CFBAC.3000803@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2feizKym29CxAecD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:58:52AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> On 02/14/13 07:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> >> On 02/14/13 06:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:06:29PM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> >>>> On 02/12/13 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to mark some filesystem as jailable, here is the one I=
need:
> >>>>> linprocfs, tmpfs and fdescfs, I was planning to do it with adding a
> >>>>> allow.mount.${fs} for each one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyone has an objection?
> >>>>
> >>>> Would it make sense for linprocfs to use the existing allow.mount.pr=
ocfs
> >>>> flag?
> >>>
> >>> Here is a patch that uses allow.mount.procfs for linsysfs and linproc=
fs.
> >>>
> >>> It also addd a new allow.mount.tmpfs to allow tmpfs.
> >>>
> >>> It seems to work here, can anyone confirm this is the right way to do=
it?
> >>>
> >>> I'll commit in 2 parts: first lin*fs, second tmpfs related things
> >>>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/jail-fs.diff
> >>
> >> There are some problems. The usage on the mount side of things looks
> >> correct, but it needs more on the jail side. I'm including a patch just
> >> of that part, with a correction in jail.h and further changes in kern_=
jail.c
> >
> > Thank you the patch has been updated with your fixes.
>=20
> One more bit (literally): PR_ALLOW_ALL in sys/jail.h needs updating.
>=20
> - Jamie
Fixed thanks
Bapt
--2feizKym29CxAecD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlEc/gkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez32ACgn5dhl2qu4auCzE22o/4ojZ/K
zlAAoLAlABbev6X7zOadrZCO+DJiusDU
=PN4l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2feizKym29CxAecD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130214150857.GK44004>