Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:31:30 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Harry Coin <harrycoin@qconline.com> Subject: Re: mss.c pcm fix to ' attach returned 6 ' load failure for v5.x acpi and up Message-ID: <42D82B32.6090707@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200507121627.44317.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20050712134818.0202b0d0@mail.qconline.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20050712150444.01fb8078@mail.qconline.com> <200507121627.44317.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 12 July 2005 04:12 pm, Harry Coin wrote: > >>John, >> >>I am sincerely appreciative the time you have taken. Your test results >>are below. >> >>I haven't processed everything you've written, but I'm not going to hold >>you up waiting as that is going to take a while. >> >>The code just comments out the line you mentioned. pcm0 loads with ACPI on >>in this case. I haven't tested what happens with ACPI off, and have no >>easy way to test what will happen with the other non-pnp chips (or other >>pnp chips) this driver supports. > > > Ok, thanks. > > >>I suggest you send a copy of your comments to whoever fixes up the >>architecture manual, because of evident disagreement regarding best >>practice in the isa non-pnp driver detection method (ISA_PNP_PROBE vs. >>isa_get_logical_id). > > > Well, I think I've just figured out why it says that (the ACPIxxxx devices), > so it looks like I am going to have to go through and fix all the various > drivers to use a probe routine if they attach to ACPI. It looks like several > drivers attach to acpi that probably don't need to as well (ACPI only > enumerates built-in hardware like COM ports, etc. It doesn't enumerate ISA > PnP cards). Thanks for looking into this. I agree that only the PNP-capable probe should attach to acpi. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42D82B32.6090707>