Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:49:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193212] [stage] sysutils/bsdconfig Message-ID: <bug-193212-13-k5bAzuPUm8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193212 --- Comment #18 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #16) > OH. I understand. FWIW here is the make.conf(5) for poudriere > DEVELOPER=yes > USE_PORTLINT=yes > USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes > BATCH=yes > WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdirs Daniel gave you an excellent answer, but I think the above means you don't understand. What I was talking about has *NOTHING* to do with poudriere. This must be the source of confusion. I finally gave up asking for poudriere logs and I started asking for something that I knew you could provide. Apparently you thought it was related to poudriere. > I really feel > like the requirement for using poudriere, a bit premature. A good "howto" is missing and I've asked a committer to write one in the official documentation, but poudriere itself is not immature at all. > Given that the use of make(1) install/deinstall/stage/* plist/ > {...} will frequently pollute the system it's on, and, as > mentioned; the lack of pertinent info, where poudriere is > concerned. This sentence makes no sense to me. It's obviously not true. > I would probably have been better off using a > dump(8) restore(8) scheme. To provide a fresh system to work > in after thoroughly testing each port. Or perhaps devise some > chroot(8) scheme. In short; I think I spent too much time > attempting to employ a development scheme, on something that > isn't [yet] readily adapted to, without a great deal of > experimentation, trial, and error. Don't get me wrong, I am all > too aware of that being a big part of general development. But > in this case [poudriere] isn't [yet] the most expedient approach. I also have no idea what you are attempting. You can literally have a working poudriere in 2 commands (1 = build jail, 2 = install portree). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193212-13-k5bAzuPUm8>