From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 12 05:10:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BD1A016A4CE; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:10:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7E86743D46; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:10:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bogorodskiy@inbox.ru)
Received: from [194.186.150.92] (port=51293 helo=inbox.ru)
	by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp 
	id 1Bv7rR-00049h-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:10:45 +0400
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:09:32 +0400
From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>,
	Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
	cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040812050932.GC69853@lame.novel.ru>
References: <200408091253.i79CrT8k058076@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040811104830.GA709@lame.novel.ru> <opsckwg0d79aq2h7@mezz>
	<20040811190458.GB96458@toxic.magnesium.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040811190458.GB96458@toxic.magnesium.net>
X-GPG: http://phptags.sourceforge.net/key
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam: Probable Spam
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fluxbox Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:10:47 -0000


--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 Adam wrote:

> And FWIW, seeing as how the old fluxbox will never get another update, I
> really don't think that x11-wm/fluxbox should be kept in the tree any
> longer; I think that x11-wm/fluxbox-devel should overwrite
> x11-wm/fluxbox immediately. </can of worms>

Agreed. Anyway, if many people want to see fluxbox in the ports tree it
could be returned, doesn't it?=20

As for fluxbox-devel -> fluxbox repocopy right now I think that it's a
good idea, becouse fluxbox-devel seems to be even more stable than fluxbox=
=20
and it's supported by developers.=20

PS I don't really want to start a war simular to the shells/bash* one :-)

-Roman Bogorodskiy

--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iQCVAwUBQRr7jIB0WzgdqspGAQJTsAP7BhNPKbZSGpkntg2HRcaEjmL4OXv/wWZc
bw6w8sXkfvvLbM2cvCbbhZsExjVTZapppH35u0+bSmOIyqCTQSj6bIFXNUObum4r
qj+94cXP5pR+tAEL3Ok+SzBvQFzQPxGmIeWuu+ZaAf+hYbewCl3NDv4cuiocoHd6
J6pHdL+Twn4=
=3ncP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd--