Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:00:42 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: giffunip@asme.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCM options (was Re: Where is FreeBSD going?) Message-ID: <p06020455bc2616e3d52d@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20040110170550.34302.qmail@web13425.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040110170550.34302.qmail@web13425.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:05 AM -0800 1/10/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: >--- Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> wrote: > > >> That's a pretty major test! Could we perhaps pick off > > something smaller? The "projects" repository, for > > instance? (or is that still tied to the base-system?) > >SVN is meant to be a replacement to CVS. The projects >repository is using perforce which happens to be a good >tool, ... Ah. I did not realize it was already using Perforce. Yeah, I would not suggest making that change. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06020455bc2616e3d52d>