From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar  1 19:46:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA03771
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 19:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA03758
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 19:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id DAA21883
	  ; Sat, 2 Mar 1996 03:42:30 GMT
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Can we get back to the original theme?? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Mar 1996 19:15:52 PST."
             <Pine.AUX.3.91.960301191343.27693C-100000@covina.lightside.com> 
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 03:42:30 +0000
Message-ID: <21881.825738150@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Jake Hamby wrote in message ID
<Pine.AUX.3.91.960301191343.27693C-100000@covina.lightside.com>:
> What about -advocacy?  Linux has one on USENET, and it's filled with much 
> the same drivel, only the Subjects look like "Windoze sucks, Linux is 
> mega el1te!" and "Bill Gates is a Baby Killer!"...  ;-)

Erk. Please, no... USENET has one advantage, it's relatively easy to
re-distribute. Unless someone wants to host this on their box, I'm
VERY against this idea. Freefall WOULD melt under the typical traffic
of most -advocacy groups generate if it had to do it by e-mail...

Gary