From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 15:20:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36151065672 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB328FC1D for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0KFKDL8089702 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0KFKDRi089701; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:13 GMT Message-Id: <201201201520.q0KFKDRi089701@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Cc: Subject: Re: bin/164094: bsdinstall(8): installer progress over 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/164094; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/164094: bsdinstall(8): installer progress over 100% Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:18:01 -0600 ----- Forwarded message from Ariane van der Steldt ----- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:46:43 +0100 From: Ariane van der Steldt To: Nathan Whitehorn Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/164094: bsdinstall(8): installer progress over 100% I came under that impression because fdisk didn't work, while before installing freebsd, it did work. gpart, due to its name and coupled with a refusing fdisk, made me jump to the conclusion that I had been given a GPT table. Is there a technical reason that geom is not automatically activated on every partition table? It seems to me that unifying these would reduce complexity and confusion to the end user. And I see no reason why the boot volume has this recognized and activated automatically, but other devices don't. -- Ariane ----- End forwarded message -----