From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 9 11: 0:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16A837B400; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:00:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020209190020.CKOI1214.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:00:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07840; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:42:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:42:53 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Bruce Evans Cc: bde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: "fast" interrupt handler threads. In-Reply-To: <20020210001539.Q3155-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Yes, anything that reaches doreti checks for ASTs and runs userret() if > necessary and possible (only for returns to user mode). > > Hmm, this check seems to be inadequate for fast interrupts. There is > no check for rescheduling if the return is to kernel mode. Do you plan on fixing anything you find wrong here? > > Bruce > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message