From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 09:12:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D84E16A400; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08C243D53; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:12:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1FKB02-0004Kv-Tl; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:11:58 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Jan Mikkelsen" In-Reply-To: Message from "Jan Mikkelsen" of "Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:47:38 +1100." <001201c648bd$226b6440$0301a8c0@transactionware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:11:58 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, 'Daichi GOTO' , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "'Mars G. Miro'" Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:12:02 -0000 > Daichi GOTO wrote: > > All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions > > and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) > > OK. How about a merge? > > I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE. > > Regards, > > Jan Mikkelsen. just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's definitely better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words, IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings. danny