From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 6 13:33:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11061 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:33:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu (SICILY.ODYSSEY.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA11056 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:33:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rvb+@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu) To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Andrzej Bialecki Subject: Re: /boot/boot.rc && /boot/rc.d References: <36925780.75AB6581@newsguy.com> From: "Robert V. Baron" Date: 06 Jan 1999 16:32:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of Wed, 06 Jan 1999 03:18:40 +0900 Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > I was thinking about possible on-comings "patches" in boot.rc > (currently known as boot.conf :), when I realized that for > third-party drivers or ports making use of loader it would better to > source files from a boot/rc.d directory. I was wondering whether boot.rc should be named loader.rc. It seems to me that /boot.config has to hang around for a while to set flags for boot2. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message