From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Jul 13 18:46:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from smtp02.primenet.com (smtp02.primenet.com [206.165.6.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1484C15145 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:46:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert@usr02.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA19666; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:45:42 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr02.primenet.com(206.165.6.202) via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd019655; Tue Jul 13 18:45:41 1999 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA22945; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:45:40 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199907140145.SAA22945@usr02.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Benchmarking web apps on Apache To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 01:45:40 +0000 (GMT) Cc: dwilde1@thuntek.net, billf@chc-chimes.com, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <37859E8A.9DF700CD@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at Jul 9, 99 04:02:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > At the very least, we don't know how Apache was compiled in each > one. It might be just a matter of compiler optimization... Speaking of which, does GCC do tail-call optimization yet? Also, has anyone assessed the amount of assembly code changes that would be necessary to use callee-pop (which GCC _does_ support)? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message