From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 26 13: 2:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB54937B401 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E81D43E65 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:02:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from hades.hell.gr (patr530-b136.otenet.gr [212.205.244.144]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g8QK2CJX018468; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:02:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from hades.hell.gr (hades [127.0.0.1]) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8QK29qE041975; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:02:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8QJg76M041415; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:42:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:42:07 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mark Murray Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ttys patch - any objections? Message-ID: <20020926194206.GD37404@hades.hell.gr> References: <20020926094019.A58629-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <200209261350.g8QDoLRP003375@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209261350.g8QDoLRP003375@grimreaper.grondar.org> X-PGP-Fingerprint: C1EB 0653 DB8B A557 3829 00F9 D60F 941A 3186 03B6 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-09-26 14:50, Mark Murray wrote: > > This seems a lot like personal preferance to me, I for one don't like a > > lot of tty's, because running getty on a bunch of ttys that I'm not going > > to use is a waste of ram.... I usually keep F1-F3 as ttys, and make F4 run > > kdm. I know I don't really have a say, but I'm sure everyone has his or > > her own preference. > > Sure! That is why I'm doing a straw poll. If more people seem to like this, > I'll commit it. If I get shouted down, I'll keep it as a local hack. I customarily turn some of them off. All I need is 2-3 vtys, to run a couple of screen(1) sessions. My own local set of changes includes a patch that is almost the opposite of the proposed change (all vtys are turned off, except for ttyv[0123]---the first four). Giorgos. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message