From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May  3 09:48:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA04336
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 3 May 1997 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov (lestat.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.50.29])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA04328
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 May 1997 09:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA04416; Sat, 3 May 1997 09:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705031636.JAA04416@lestat.nas.nasa.gov>
X-Authentication-Warning: lestat.nas.nasa.gov: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Cc: adrian@obiwan.psinet.net.au (Adrian Chadd), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Antispam sendmail.cf modifications.. 
Reply-To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 09:36:06 -0700
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 3 May 1997 22:59:02 +1000 (EST) 
 Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> wrote:

 > hmmm, someone should develop a tcl/tk interface to sendmail.cf so that it
 > is easier to administer.  heck, if someone can write a gui for NT to
 > sendmail.cf, why can't someone do it for unix ?

...who needs a GUI when you have m4?  :-)

Dunno...I'm skeptical of GUIs for system configuration.  Just seems
that there's no way they could ever be flexible enough to handle everyting.

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939