From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 19 10:55:30 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8869D16A41F;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C5143D55;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2])
	by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05C9BC66;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:50:30 +0200."
	<20050819105030.GA21893@garage.freebsd.pl> 
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:55:27 +0200
Message-ID: <28774.1124448927@phk.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>,
	Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:30 -0000

In message <20050819105030.GA21893@garage.freebsd.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:

>We should really consider documenting ALL sysctls in one file.
>Even if documentation will look like "see something(4)", where the
>detailed description is.

Now that we have the description field compiled in, it would seem obvious
to put a manual page reference in that field.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.