Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:17:32 -0400 From: Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r393282 - head/lang/chicken Message-ID: <55BE267C.8010508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150731065008.GA75492@FreeBSD.org> References: <201507310018.t6V0IniB009882@repo.freebsd.org> <20150731065008.GA75492@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/31/2015 02:50, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Jason Unovitch wrote: >> New Revision: 393282 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/393282 >> >> Log: >> Security update to Chicken 4.10.0 RC4 >> [...] >> >> PORTNAME= chicken >> -PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r1 >> +PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r4 >> PORTEPOCH= 1 >> CATEGORIES= lang scheme >> -MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/06/07/ >> -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r1=rc1} >> +MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/07/24/ >> +DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r4=rc4} > > Yuck. Any reason not to use DISTVERSION rather than PORTVERSION + dances? > > ./danfe > No, there's no reason to not use DISTVERSION. I made a mention to it to the maintainer in https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/200980 and I'll keep the feedback in mind for next time myself as well. In the near term when 4.10.0 is finally released we can snip off the .r4 and remove the DISTNAME dance. Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55BE267C.8010508>