From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 14:25:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166FD16A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:25:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9EC43D55 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24630 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2005 14:25:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Dec 2005 14:25:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4302F2841D; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:25:08 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Kiffin Gish" References: <000301c5f9e4$5861c7b0$2101a8c0@ZGISH> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Dec 2005 09:25:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <000301c5f9e4$5861c7b0$2101a8c0@ZGISH> Message-ID: <44bqzt3ry3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libstdc++.so.5 howto ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:25:15 -0000 "Kiffin Gish" writes: > I guess what I was trying to say is that I am very confused about all this > linux compatible stuff. I noticed there are many emulator ports for red hat, > suse, etc. and it is not clear to me which strategy to use. There's even an > Xfree linux compat in there, what for? For linking to Linux applications. > If I have an executable complaining that it cannot find libstdc++.so.5, what > can I do? Since it's supposed to be a Linux application, it should be getting it out of the Linux compatibility area. You said that was in place, so the question is why the linker isn't finding that one. > Perhaps there is a useful guide out there someplace, the FreeBSD handbook > chapter on the subject is very short. "man linux", for one thing.