From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 17 11:22:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A48437B406; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from charter.net (dhcp-220-8.slidell.charter-ala.com [24.158.214.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D50C43E65; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:22:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glennpj@charter.net) Received: from gforce.johnson.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by charter.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8HIMXq5041255; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:22:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn@gforce.johnson.home) Received: (from glenn@localhost) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8HIMSLN041254; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:22:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Glenn Johnson Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:22:27 -0500 To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: Pat Lashley , gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a Message-ID: <20020917182227.GA41201@gforce.johnson.home> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Marcus Clarke , Pat Lashley , gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200209171730.g8HHUQvt017995@freefall.freebsd.org> <1032286059.331.37.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1032286059.331.37.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:07:38PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Okay, what about this: > > mozilla-vendor --> 1.0.x > mozilla --> latest official release (1.1 now) > mozilla-devel --> latest pre-release (1.2a now) > > Thoughts (Joe K?)? Who wants to see this? Should it happen before > 4.7-REL? I just want to be done with this whole thing, but I want to > make sure that if we make the change, it will stick, and will sound > reasonable to the majority. Joe, That seems to be the most reasonable way to do it if we have all of them in the ports tree. This sure did turn out to be a can of worms. :) Thanks for all of your hard work on this and GNOME issues. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message