From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 21:25:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C54106566C; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2775A15660B; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC6CD41.5030800@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:25:21 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: d@delphij.net References: <201111182020.pAIKKRbG033264@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EC6BEA5.1080504@FreeBSD.org> <4EC6CC52.5060002@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4EC6CC52.5060002@delphij.net> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Xin LI , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Xin LI , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:25:22 -0000 On 11/18/2011 13:21, Xin LI wrote: > On 11/18/11 12:23, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 11/18/2011 12:20, Xin LI wrote: >>> delphij 2011-11-18 20:20:27 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: security/vuxml vuln.xml Log: Bump modified >>> date for previous commit. > >> I purposely did not do that because there was no material >> modification to the entry. The previous URL still works, and both >> have the same data. > > Changing URL requires bump of modification date, which serves as a > flag for downstream consumers to re-render the item's result object. > Without the bump, the URL would only be updated until a full rebuild > is done. ... right ... and since the old URL is still valid, I didn't see the need to force that. Just sayin' ... -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/