From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 18:09:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3013AFB2597 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46AB7EBE5 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:09:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3UI929F088672 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:09:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: fjwcash@gmail.com Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3UI8p20049435 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 May 2018 01:08:51 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help To: Freddie Cash References: <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <5AE4D1AC.3080702@grosbein.net> <5AE75988.3020306@grosbein.net> Cc: freebsd-net , Abdullah Tariq From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5AE75BAD.8030303@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 01:08:45 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:09:14 -0000 01.05.2018 1:03, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein >wrote: > > > What the OP is trying to do is have PC1 send untagged packets to igb0 on FreeBSD which is configured for tagged vlan 5. > > Then bridge the packets to igb1 which is also configured for tagged vlan 5. Then send the packets out, untagged, to PC2. > > Why would one want to "configure igb0 for tagged vlan 5" when igb0 supposed to receive untagged frames? > This does not make any sense. One should just bridge igb0 as is, without creation vlan on it and problem's solved. > > ​Yes, agree. What the OP wants to do can't be done. :)​ Perhaps, you missed a message from him when he states that configuration style does no matter for him really. So, what he wants can be done, just using different style.