Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800
From:      Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: One or Four?
Message-ID:  <A0622100-E7BB-44E1-A658-E9BC3A9D2EE9@lafn.org>
In-Reply-To: <ECC9F8CC-7535-4C82-9F88-358DA3B42D5C@mac.com>
References:  <4F3ECF23.5000706@fisglobal.com> <ECC9F8CC-7535-4C82-9F88-358DA3B42D5C@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style =
default with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 =
partition and swap.


I only run servers and set them up with /, /usr, and swap.  Other =
partitions are placed on other disks with typically one partition per =
disk.  I link /var and /tmp into /usr.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A0622100-E7BB-44E1-A658-E9BC3A9D2EE9>