From nobody Tue Nov 21 18:03:25 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SZXLD3yrdz522hP for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SZXLD00LRz4l94 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id CEB323C019A; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:03:25 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Warner Losh Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Time to remove sccs tags Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:199.48.128.0/22, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SZXLD00LRz4l94 On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 09:12:48AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > It's been 30 odd years since the last csrg release. They are no more. > > At this point I think we can safely remove the few sccs tags that remain in > the tree. The data will be there in git if we ever need it. > > Comments? Yes please. The history is there in there repo(s) and there's so much blind copying where the context is entirely lost. >From my perspective it would be nice to have fewer commits per-subtree than with $FreeBSD removal. In recent spelunking I've found that for low traffic sub-trees I'm seeing a full screen (~50 lines for me) or more of those logs before getting to commits with content changes due to inconsistent formatting leading to multiple removal commits. -- Brooks