From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 02:16:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BC616A4D7; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv01.sparkit.no (srv01.sparkit.no [193.69.116.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAA443D5C; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws ([193.69.114.88]) by srv01.sparkit.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3L9FucZ085653; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:15:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws (8.12.9/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3L9EYTH004822; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:14:35 GMT (envelope-from eivind@ws) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by ws (8.12.9/8.12.10/Submit) id i3L9EYj0004820; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:14:34 GMT (envelope-from eivind) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:13:33 +0000 From: Eivind Eklund To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20040421091333.GA4518@FreeBSD.org> References: <200404210439.i3L4dqJg023358@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404210439.i3L4dqJg023358@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stable kqueue locking up and running on SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:16:04 -0000 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:39:52AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > what is expected. The only missing feature is the ill-conceived NOTE_TRACK. > I do not think that returning for that one note type EINVAL is a deal-breaker > when trying to make kqueue not suck for 5.3; it is far more useful as a > novelty than utility, especially considering I've never seen mention of it > in actual software that uses kqueue. There are no interesting references to it in Google - the only indication that anybody has ever used it is a bugfix: https://citadelle.intrinsec.com/mailing/current/HTML/ml_openbsd-bugs/1801.html Eivind.