From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 02:38:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B511D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 02:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from octopus.fizon.de (housing74.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDCE43D31
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 02:38:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rb@octopus.fizon.de)
Received: from octopus.fizon.de (localhost.fizon.de [127.0.0.1])
	by octopus.fizon.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i29AcLQ3030902;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:38:21 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from rb@octopus.fizon.de)
Received: (from rb@localhost)
	by octopus.fizon.de (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i29AcLFd030901;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:38:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:38:21 +0100
From: Robert Barten <robert@barok.de>
To: Chris Strzelczyk <chris@stenchmaster.com>
Message-ID: <20040309103821.GA30792@octopus>
References: <404CBEDA.4000407@stenchmaster.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <404CBEDA.4000407@stenchmaster.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssasin Configuration
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:38:23 -0000

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:43:38PM -0500, Chris Strzelczyk wrote:
> I was wondering if people were having trouble with the latest 
> spamass-milter port?  I heard that the milter causes sendmail to crash 
> on systems and I wanted to confirm with users that are actively using it 
> before I put it on my production systems. 

I do use spamass-milter for 7 months without any problems.

> What is the recommended way of running SpamAssasin on a production 
> system with 100-300 users?  Procmail or spamass-milter.

It depends whether you want to filter outgoing mail as well. In that
case I'd choose the milter. Keep in mind: sending emails could last some
seconds longer than usual (here 25 seconds).

-- 
Robert Barten