From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 15 14:40:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6218E16A406 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2029443D5C for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3FEeIpr054027 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3FEeI8V054026; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:18 GMT Message-Id: <200604151440.k3FEeI8V054026@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bill Trost Cc: Subject: Re: conf/15010 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bill Trost List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:40:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/15010; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bill Trost To: Maxim Konovalov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/15010 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:31:48 -0700 Maxim Konovalov writes: If you still interested in the PR could you please update the patch you want to see in FreeBSD. The one is the PR is not correct as David explains. Thanks! Wow, these bugs live forever.... Let's see, my suggestion included the line $fwcmd add pass all from 255.255.255.255 to $ip via $ip on the theory that limited broadcast should be permitted. David correctly points out that the broadcast address as the source is always wrong. Whoops. OK, so what I think it really should say is $fwcmd add pass all from ${net}:$mask to 255.255.255.255 via $ip Does that seem plausible? Bill