From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 21:30:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139B3106567C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C3C8FC16 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CLUGFF054420 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2CLUG5l054419; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:16 GMT Message-Id: <201203122130.q2CLUG5l054419@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Johnston Cc: Subject: Re: bin/143017: watch(8): fatal: cannot attach to tty X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Johnston List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:30:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/143017; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Johnston To: Ed Schouten Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, dummy@smtp.ru Subject: Re: bin/143017: watch(8): fatal: cannot attach to tty Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:17:50 -0400 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07:06PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Mark, > > * Mark Johnston , 20120312 03:27: > > - Remove interactive mode... I don't see why it's needed either. > > It's still there, even after applying your patch. Search for > `opt_interactive. > Oh, I was referring to the -i flag; my comment was misleading, sorry. opt_interactive (or something similar) is still needed in order for watch(8) to work properly when writing output to a file, no? -Mark