From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 28 17:36:37 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6691F37B401; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E751443F75; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:36:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31562A89E; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:36:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto opensslconf-alpha.h opensslconf-i386.h opensslconf-ia64.h opensslconf-powerpc.h opensslconf-sparc64.h In-Reply-To: <200301290106.h0T16F6P029651@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:36:30 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030129013630.C31562A89E@canning.wemm.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jacques Vidrine wrote: > nectar 2003/01/28 17:06:15 PST > > Modified files: > secure/lib/libcrypto opensslconf-alpha.h opensslconf-i386.h > opensslconf-ia64.h opensslconf-powerpc.h > opensslconf-sparc64.h > Log: > Force OPENSSL_NO_KRB5. OpenSSL's current implementation of RFC 2712 > can only be built with MIT Kerberos. > > If we didn't define this here, then SSL-using applications would have > to define OPENSSL_NO_KRB5 themselves in order to build. Ok, but what does this mean in the real world? Do krb5 users need to stop building world? Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message