From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 20 18:10:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-c.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.183.3.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887837B4C5 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 61595 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Nov 2000 02:10:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Nov 2000 02:10:13 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:10:13 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Jesper Skriver Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? In-Reply-To: <20001120222330.A66051@skriver.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 06:30:04PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Ok, you've got me convinced, it should be implemented. > > > > There's a problem, though. Later RFCs say to use 13 instead of 10, as 10 > > was supposed to be for darpa use only. > > My code reacts to all 3. > > > Perhaps you should retest the other OSes and see if they're only responding > > to one of the two messages. > > I could do this, but does it make much difference ? Well, it makes a difference in choosing which code you should have the cisco respond with. Perhaps the other OSes are respecting 13 but not 9 or 10. > > I assume you're using sendmail's "relay if I'm listed as a MX" feature > > right now? > > No, I'm actually using postfix, and a addition I wrote myself, from a > previous email in this thread ... The concept seems well thought out. I suppose what you need to do is continue on with the achking until postfix is happy to be the primary MX and deliver to the backups automatically. Other than that, I can't think of any improvements that would be easy for customers to understand. Sorry for assuming you hadn't put much time into this. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message