Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 21:11:57 +0100 From: Frank Nobis <fn@radio-do.de> To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: __int64_t Message-ID: <1A8974EA-34E7-11D9-B3FF-000A95A94932@radio-do.de> In-Reply-To: <419462B2.1020303@orel.ru> References: <20041112005226.GL52553@km.ua> <419462B2.1020303@orel.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12. Nov 2004 um 08:13 schrieb Andrew Belashov: > > Hi! > > Maxim Mazurok wrote: > | can i check, for 64 bit or 32 bit time_t compilled my binaries and > kernel? > > Simple test: > > $ grep time_t /usr/include/machine/_types.h > typedef __int64_t __time_t; /* time()... */ > Maybe too simple. Source and binaries are not allways in sync. > | for 64 bit or 32 bit time_t compilled binaries and kernel in > 5.3-RELEASE > | iso? > I don't know how to test unknown compiled binaries, but if you have sources you could test sizeof(time_t) to be 8. Gruß Frank - -- Frank Nobis, Thielenstr. 12, 44369 Dortmund Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBlRkYNTxD6oqBaVcRAjjxAJ9AaMtWzgHNfTtv33y1O6fr6HXJmACfV7LG fy4pUHvI4o5HExTfeTDPhdE= =5Qgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1A8974EA-34E7-11D9-B3FF-000A95A94932>