From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Feb 7 00:54:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907FDCD214C; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from butcher-nb.yandex.net (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FD412E0; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r313330 - in head: contrib/netcat lib/libipsec sbin/ifconfig sbin/setkey share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/modules sys/modules/ipsec sys/modules/tcp/tcpmd5 sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet/tcp... To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <201702060849.v168nwmf064277@repo.freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Message-ID: <1e8b55ba-11d2-9563-be44-0e20f7f2f33d@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:53:05 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:54:22 -0000 On 06.02.2017 17:31, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >> Date: Mon Feb 6 08:49:57 2017 >> New Revision: 313330 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313330 >> >> Log: >> Merge projects/ipsec into head/. > > [snip] > > Great, thanks! > > Have you any plans to merge this into stable/11 to reduce diffs in network > stack code? It depends from the further users feedback. I wanted to do MFC after one or two months. But there are two things that are questionable. The date of stable/11 feature freeze is not known. And there is also some changes that can be considered as POLA violations. E.g. now SPIs are unique, and if user had manually configured SAs with the same SPI, the MFC will break this. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov