From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 15 7:50: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6792215238 for ; Sat, 15 May 1999 07:49:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from soda@sra.co.jp) Received: from srasvf.sra.co.jp (srasvf [133.137.28.2]) by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-sraigw) with ESMTP id XAA20345; Sat, 15 May 1999 23:49:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from srapc342.sra.co.jp (srapc342 [133.137.28.111]) by srasvf.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-srambox) with ESMTP id XAA00663; Sat, 15 May 1999 23:49:37 +0900 (JST) Received: (from soda@localhost) by srapc342.sra.co.jp (8.8.8/3.4W-sra) id XAA25692; Sat, 15 May 1999 23:49:46 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 23:49:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199905151449.XAA25692@srapc342.sra.co.jp> From: Noriyuki Soda To: Doug Rabson Cc: Noriyuki Soda , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c In-Reply-To: References: <199905120926.SAA19601@srapc342.sra.co.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> On Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST), Doug Rabson said: > As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I > don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly > don't want to continue a flamewar). > Can people please just drop the subject until after Usenix. This kind of > flamewar is too upsetting (to me anyway) and just makes it harder to have > a useful face-to-face discussion. As I said earlier, I agree with you. About human factor, I think face to face communication is best way to solve problem. But about technical issues, I'd like to reply in public place, because both the message from Julian (*1) and the message from Daniel (*2) showed typical misunderstanding about newconfig. The goal they showed is also the goal of the dynamic configuration of newconfig from the beggining. I'd like to show how it will be achieved by newconifg. Could you permit me to answer technical issues in -hackers as Daniel adviced ? Or, -current is better about the questions which is posted to -current ? Other possibility is newconfig mailig list (anyone can subscribe it and it's archive can be accessed from WWW), or postponement until after Usenix. How do you think? (*1) Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:08:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: (*2) From: "Daniel C. Sobral" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 20:46:05 +0900 Message-ID: <373C0CFD.7D9D3775@newsguy.com> -- soda To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message