Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:03:13 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com>, bob@a1poweruser.com, User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module Message-ID: <466C4AF1.6090106@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <466BA8D5.9090009@quip.cz> References: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBIEGGCDAA.bob@a1poweruser.com> <466B17E6.9000906@vindaloo.com> <49217.192.168.125.81.1181426436.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <466B579F.2080106@vindaloo.com> <466BA8D5.9090009@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>
> I guess that mod_php5 depends on Apache and maintainer don't want this
> big dependency. The second is - if it will depends on Apache of some
> version (eg. 1.3) it will be broken with another version (2.0 and 2.2).
> It apply for binary packages. If somebody is compiling ports himself,
> then can check option "with apache" or add WITH_APACHE in to /etc/make.conf
>
>
That makes sense almost to the point of justifying the existence of a
mod_php5 port for those people who want apache+mod_php5. However given
the fact that this would double the workload on the maintainer I
understand.
Thanks
-- Chris
--
__o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work."
_`\<,_ -Rosa Parks
___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________
Christopher Sean Hilton <chris | at | vindaloo.com>
pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?466C4AF1.6090106>