From owner-freebsd-security Wed May 5 13:11:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE98E14DAA for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25401; Wed, 5 May 1999 14:11:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.37.19990505140848.0458b850@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.37 (Beta) Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 14:10:59 -0600 To: Wes Peters From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: [Jamie Rishaw ] FreeBSD 3.1 remote reboot exploit Cc: Jacob Zehnder , security@FreeBSD.ORG, jamie@exodus.net In-Reply-To: <3730A208.75596C9B@softweyr.com> References: <4.2.0.37.19990504212515.045d3100@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:54 PM 5/5/99 -0600, Wes Peters wrote: >The fact that no information whatsoever was included in the post points >out that the poster had no intention of helping in any way. What his >motiviations for this are we cannot tell. I would certainly be curious. One doesn't gain prestige by posting an unverifiable report, and the degree of FUD generated by one unverified report is not significant. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message