From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 07:32:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D7A106569B for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D068FC1B for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9N7WU5U008267; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:32:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m9N7WTjE008264; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Carl In-Reply-To: <48FFFDC6.9090206@telus.net> Message-ID: <20081023093144.N8253@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <48FE709D.9080907@telus.net> <20081022153034.L2152@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <48FFFDC6.9090206@telus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:32:39 -0000 >>> I thought the -s option was only applicable when using "-b split" for the >>> balancing algorithm. Does "round-robin" not mean simply alternating >>> between the two disks without ever splitting requests? >> >> no. it means for example with -s 65536 and 1MB request - it will split this >> request on 2 disks >> > > So there is no difference between "split" and "round-robin" algorithms then? > looks there is. i never used split balance. always round-robin or load.